Oregon House Passes Veterans Help
SALEM, Ore. – The Oregon House of Representatives passed legislation Thursday designed to aid military veterans seeking civilian employment.
While the new law is a relatively small change, supporters say it will have a large positive impact on veteran welfare and employment.
House Bill 4063 would require certain licensing boards to take into account training received in the military when evaluating veterans seeking employment in a particular industry.
Currently, many returning veterans find that the training they received in the military could be put to practical use in civilian occupations. The bill’s carrier, State Representative Julie Parrish, R-West Linn, provided a long list of such occupations in a variety of fields, including security, education, medicine, and engineering.
In principle, such opportunities seem like an excellent way for veterans to reintegrate into civilian life. However, many veterans find that the training they received in the military cannot be transferred into the civilian arena; and veterans are often forced to waste time and money by repeating training they have already received.
“Many times soldiers have difficulty explaining their training and skills in civilian speak,” said Parrish. “The methodology of military training does not always line up perfectly [with civilian education].”
Several other representatives expressed strong support for the bill, praising it as an important move towards greater veteran employment.
“This is something we can all do in all of our districts to get our overly unemployed veterans back to work,” said Rep. Deborah Boone, D-Cannon Beach.
Rep. Greg Matthews, D-Gresham, also gave a speech in support of the bill. He stressed that the issue runs deeper than simply finding jobs and is really about finding a place for returning soldiers in society.
“The problem is…we don’t know how to receive them,” said Matthews. “We don’t know how to transfer their experience to the civilian world. This is one more step.”
Although several representatives voiced concerns about the bill, their objections pertained to the bill’s subsection on teacher licensing, which was interpreted as being inconsistent with the rest of the resolution. A linguistic error left open the possibility that veterans might not be able to transfer their educational training into a teaching license.
Parrish addressed the teaching concern by promising that the bill would be amended in the Senate to solve the language problem. This was enough to satisfy most of the representatives who had objected. Reps. Margaret Doherty, D-Tigard, Jeff Barker, D-Aloha, and Matthews all pledged to vote for the bill once they had been assured that the amendment would be added.
The bill faced no other opposition and passed with a nearly unanimous vote. Even Rep. Michael Dembrow, D-Portland, who voted against the bill, explained that his vote was purely due to the problem with the teaching provision.
“I love this bill,” said Dembrow. “I will be voting ‘no’ on it today, but I look forward to voting ‘yes’ on it when it comes back with the changes.”
In her closing speech, Parrish again emphasized the value of putting veterans back to work and thanked both veterans and veterans’ organizations for their work in support of the bill.
“The people doing work for veterans are a quiet few,” said Parrish. “We can’t put a price tag on the value we can return to them for all they’ve done for us.”


Report an error

Your Latest Comments