Toledo Water District customers will see rates rise significantly under a bond-sale plan approved September 7 by the Toledo City Council. The actual rate of increase would depend on the amount of bonds sold, and the calendar of sale. City Manager Michelle Amberg said “People should count on their bills going up,” but when they will rise is still unknown. “The earliest the bonds could be sold could be March 2012…but it could be much later than that,” Amberg said, adding “It depends on how they are packaged and the calendar” for sale and payback.
The revenue bonds would create an estimated $8.6 million in debt to pay for improvements laid out in the city’s 20-year water master plan adopted this spring. They would finance the first two phases of construction, resulting in an estimated 82% increase in the average water bill, from $32.34 per month to $58.67 per month. Amberg stressed in a memo to council that the figures “are provided for comparison and are based on our best estimates at this time; they are subject to change as future variables arise.” Council members debated revenue bonds, where water customers provide the revenue through rates, and general obligation bonds, which require a taxpayer vote because they increase property taxes. Although there was some sentiment that voters should be asked to agree at the ballot box to future increases, it was important to be prepared for revenue bonds to get the project underway as quickly as possible.
There are four phases to the plan. The costs of Phase I will be borne entirely by customers of the Toledo Water District, as all the improvements are directly related to the city system. Half the cost of later phases would be paid for by the Seal Rock Water District, which buys all of its water from Toledo. Councilors have been discussing bonding vs. borrowing, because the city’s water rates are too low to allow for grants or other government assistance. The Water District began raising rates this year, and warned that rate increases will continue.
The need for work on the water infrastructure has been discussed for several years, and the system is prone to random failures as it ages, according to Toledo Public Works Director Adam Denlinger. In July, emergency repairs had to be done to the city’s drinking water clearwell and a water main at 10th and Main Streets. In mid-August, emergency repairs were done at the Siletz River water intake, to fill a huge washout caused by continuing high water over the winter and spring. The Siletz Water Intake, built in the 1930s, was identified by the city’s consulting engineers as a facility that could “fail at any time.”
The city’s water master plan is ambitious, but Denlinger says it has to be, to upgrade aging systems, improve fire safety and plan for growth. Important parts of the system’s infrastructure are more than 40 years old, and need to be replaced, including intake piping, water storage facilities and neighborhood transmission piping. Phase I involves construction of a new storage tank at Skyline Drive and a booster pump for areas of the system not served by a tank gravity feed. Denlinger said improvements in distribution piping to improve water flow are also needed. The most recent study showed more than 20% of the city’s 142 fire hydrants have inadequate pressure, most of them in the Skyline area and along SE Sturdevant Road south of SE Ammon Road.
Phase II of the plan would see replacement of the Siletz River intake and pump station, and the piping that crosses the Olalla Reservoir. The report assesses the 70-year-old Siletz facility as being “in very poor condition” and says it must be entirely replaced in the near future.
The third phase includes refurbishment of the city’s two existing storage tanks on Ammon Road and Graham Street, some improvements in water treatment capacity and more work on the water distribution system.
The final phase proposes $9.6 million be spent on the 42-year-old Mill Creek pump station and 5.3 miles of transmission piping into the city’s water treatment facility. Most of this piping is 60 years old and needs replacement. The existing pipeline is too small to meet flow needs and is laid through inaccessible areas such as wetlands or under buildings.
Report an error
Your Latest Comments