[Editor's note: This article is part of our new special report series: Toledo's Water Future. Read the introduction here.]
The Toledo City Council is expected to continue discussing the merits of increasing Toledo’s System Development Charges (SDC) at the December 1 City Council meeting. SDCs are one-time charges by municipalities on certain new construction to pay for new infrastructure capacity. SDCs are widely used to help communities expand water, wastewater, transportation, storm water and park services without charging existing customers. Toledo currently has SDCs based on 1994 calculations, charging $2,616 per ‘equivalent dwelling unit’ (EDU). This compares to EDU charges between $9,000 and $12,000 for similar Oregon cities. A report prepared by city consultant Civil West Engineering showed the city could defend SDCs totaling more than $14,000 per EDU – more than a five-fold increase.
City officials are careful to point out that SDCs are only triggered for new construction, some commercial renovation, if the new use would affect system capacity, or in instances where a homeowner turns a single family unit into a duplex or fourplex.
The largest and most important SDC category for Toledo is to pay for expansion of the water system. For example, if a developer builds a series of new homes, the water SDC charges would go in a fund to help pay for water demand those homes will make on the system – future demand. The same for wastewater or storm drainage. Council member Mark Camara, who was the council’s representative to an SDC working group, says the key is balancing the need to charge versus the ability to pay. In comments on the Wavelength website, Camara wrote “The way I see it, the main argument for raising SDCs is the idea that the same folks who create the need to increase capacity should shoulder the costs of meeting their infrastructure needs. On the other hand the argument against SDCs (is) a philosophical…perspective that it is in the best interests of the entire community to collectively subsidize new development through higher rates…because we all benefit from growth.”
Toledo resident Jake Postlewait, Manager of the Toledo branch of Oregon Coast Bank, was a member of the city’s SDC review committee. In a letter to committee members and the City Council, he asked everyone to be prudent in applying new fees too heavily, so as not to stifle growth. “I would advocate that the general approach…should be one of moderation and a desire to connect SDCs with the overall growth goals for Toledo,” he wrote. The letter continued, “A question that should be asked, ‘Is Toledo in a position to go head-to-head with coastal cities such as Newport regarding SDC fees and expect to win a good share of the market?’”
All sides have their points. And applying appropriate levels of System Development Charges is a political balancing act as well as an economic one. If the city is to grow, it needs to build out new infrastructure and ask those who create the need to pay for it. But if it charges too much, it could stifle or discourage new development. Council members are doing their homework prior to the next meeting December 1, and will consider some ‘conversion rates’ between SDCs and fees or taxes for non-enterprise infrastructure. That suggestion came from Councilor Ralph Grutzmacher, who thought it would be easier for members to consider the true impact of each SDC, if they have those numbers as a comparison. You can read the city’s SDC methodology on the “Documents” drop-down menu at www.cityoftoledo.org
Even if it is not clear yet what the increases in SDC charges will be, it is certain that at least some of them will rise. How much, and whether they will rise in one jump or in a graduated fashion, will be the subject of more public debate December 1.
Report an error
Your Latest Comments